EDITORIAL: Facing a grim finale

Shareholders in South Africa’s most notorious company face a grim scenario

Former Steinhoff CEO Markus Jooste. Picture: ESA ALEXANDER/SUNDAY TIMES
Former Steinhoff CEO Markus Jooste. Picture: ESA ALEXANDER/SUNDAY TIMES

It’s been five years in coming, but it seems South Africa’s most notorious company, Steinhoff, may have reached its sell-by date.

Last week, Steinhoff announced that shareholders will have to vote on a plan to hand over 80% of the company to creditors in exchange for deferring the repayment of debt from 2023 to 2026.

It means shareholders will retain just 20% of the company — but that’s actually the best-case scenario: if they veto the plan, the financiers will take over the entire company. 

It’s a case of Hobson’s choice for shareholders, who have seen the value of R100,000 invested on December 1 2017 dwindle to R1,013 today. But after an earth-shattering fraud of R106bn, few would have expected Steinhoff to still be going.

That it has survived is due to its strong assets — including 51% in Pepkor (worth R37bn) and 78% of Pepco (worth an estimated R67bn). The problem is, they’re not chalking up profits fast enough to dent Steinhoff’s €10bn debt. 

Some shareholders will grumble that Steinhoff surely had other options. But for those who hung on, it’s a grim denouement.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Comment icon