Improved sentiment in South Africa since the formation of the GNU, the introduction of the two-pot retirement system and a sustained reprieve from load-shedding hasn’t yet translated into better trading conditions for diversified conglomerate KAP.
Meanwhile, uncertainty on the global stage continues to gather force. With US President Donald Trump’s tariffs beginning to spark reciprocal measures from affected nations, the risk of a full-scale trade war is rising. For companies like KAP that operate in sectors linked to global markets, these macro risks could prove particularly disruptive.
KAP is, in theory, well positioned to weather economic swings. Its portfolio is diversified in the truest sense of the word, spanning industries as varied as logistics, polymers, automotive components and bedding.
The logic is sound: when one sector dips, another can cushion the fall. But in the kind of environment that might emerge if tariff escalation tips into a broader economic contraction, historical patterns show that everything starts moving in the same direction — down. That means the countercyclical balance that KAP’s model depends on becomes less effective, making it difficult to count on internal diversification as a safety net.
At least from a capital expenditure standpoint, the group is through the most demanding phase of its investment cycle. That gives it some breathing room. Notably, PG Bison — KAP’s largest division, contributing 36% of group profits — completed a major three-year capex project at its Mkhondo plant in June 2024.
The facility, a key producer of wood-based panel products such as particle board and medium-density fibreboard, increased its output capacity by 33%. While this promises significant long-term upside, the short-term pain has been clear in the interim 2025 numbers. Higher operating costs from ramping up production, combined with suboptimal utilisation and subdued sales pricing, put pressure on profitability. This should normalise over the next four years as the new capacity is fully — and more efficiently — converted into sales, but for now it’s a drag.
Safripol, the polymer division contributing 24% of KAP’s profits, is doing better in the short term. The company, which operates high-density polyethylene and polypropylene plants in Sasolburg and a polyethylene terephthalate resin facility in Durban, saw interim profits jump 58%. That was thanks to a combination of increased production, stronger sales volumes and better plant efficiencies.
At least from a capital expenditure standpoint, the group is through the most demanding phase of its investment cycle
But the picture isn’t entirely rosy. The global polymer market remains in a cyclical trough, and expectations are that it may not recover meaningfully until at least 2027. So while operational performance is encouraging, structural headwinds are likely to persist for some time.
Unitrans, the logistics and transport division responsible for 28% of profits, had a solid interim showing. A significant restructuring has begun to pay off, with profits up 22%. KAP had previously explored a sale of this division but failed to secure a satisfactory price. That suggests it may not be viewed as a premium asset, despite the improved performance. Still, in an environment where cash flow matters more than expansion, a steady and improving logistics business can be valuable, particularly in Africa, where transport infrastructure challenges create natural barriers to entry.
Feltex, at just 4% of group profits, is exposed in a different way. As a supplier of bulky automotive components — products that are not easy to import efficiently — it’s partially shielded from international competition. But that also means it’s vulnerable to global automotive supply chain volatility and, now, to tariff-related economic woes. If trade tensions worsen, Feltex could see both cost pressure and demand softness from original equipment manufacturing customers caught in the crossfire.
The Sleep Group, a leading manufacturer of bedding and mattresses, formerly known as Restonic, accounts for 8% of group profits and is a relatively bright spot. Profit growth has come through higher sales and tight cost control. It’s a mature business in a stable sector, which helps in times of uncertainty. But it’s too small to carry the group.
At an earnings multiple of just seven, the share isn’t expensive. But when global macro risk is this elevated, a cyclical industrial counter is probably not the safest bet. High debt levels, after years of expansionary capital investment, add to the risk, with the group’s gearing ratio at 2.4. The plan is to reduce this to two by repaying R1bn in debt during the 2025 financial year, funded by increased free cash flow as the expanded PG Bison plant ramps up and capex falls off.
That plan makes sense and, if executed, would mark a turning point in the group’s balance sheet health. But until that derisking is visible in the numbers, prudent investors might prefer to stay on the sidelines. KAP’s fundamentals aren’t broken, and its assets are solid, but in a world edging closer to economic contraction, there are probably more predictable places to put capital to work.
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.